SPIRITS REPORT
Verna:
1. What was your role in this investigation? (Please check one)
Other
Comment: sensitive researcher
2. What equipment did you use on this investigation?
No Response
3. What phenomena did you experience on this investigation? (Please check all that apply)
Sensation of energy
4. In review of the footage, recording, or photographs taken at the location, which of the following did you find? (Please check all that apply)
No Response
5. What technical observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Verna Peddi. Did not experience any technical observations
6. What sensitive observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Verna Peddi- I was not able to pick up very much energy at the bridge. I would say about half way down the bridge, Beth was picking up some high EMF and asked me to stand in that area. We were both picking up energy there. There was just a feeling that this fishing pier was just not a pleasant place to go and have fun. Normally when yo think of a fishing pier you think of fun and laughter and it was very dull and unresponsive.
7. What researched/historical information did you learn about this location? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Verna Peddi- Brandy Stark and myself walked the entire bridge and approached people fishing to ask about their experiences on the bridge and or have they ever heard about the accident, hitch hikers etc etc. We met a mother and daughter and they both stated that they have heard teh story but never experienced anything out there. We then met an older set of couples from West Va and they told us about the accident. This group had not themselves experienced anything. everyone else on the bridge that we spoke too seemed unconcerned or not aware of the bridges history.
8. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the haunting of this location? Note on scale: 1 represents "no haunting", 5 "moderate haunting" and 10 "extremely haunted"?
4
9. What issues does the review team need to address with the occupant (homeowner, business owner, resident)? What aspects of the investigation need to be re-addressed, retested, or clarified?
No Response
10. Is there any other information that you would like to add about this investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
No Response
Cheryl:
1. What was your role in this investigation? (Please check one)
Investigator (general)
2. What equipment did you use on this investigation?
Digital camera
Electro Magnetic Field Meter (EMF meter)
3. What phenomena did you experience on this investigation? (Please check all that apply)
Comment: None
4. In review of the footage, recording, or photographs taken at the location, which of the following did you find? (Please check all that apply)
No unusual occurrences at all
5. What technical observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Cheryl: Outdoor venue eliminated possiblities of cold spots. Clear day, breezy, no precipitation, high visibility.
6. What sensitive observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Cheryl: The area felt void of emotion, other than a slight feeling of impending doom, presumably related to the bridge tragedy.
7. What researched/historical information did you learn about this location? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Cheryl: Was aware of the tragedy of the bridge collapse and the Coast Guard incident, as well as the awareness of the bridge as a last stop for suicidal people. I had heard stories of a spectral "flirty fisherman" and a ghostly hitchhiker.
8. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the haunting of this location? Note on scale: 1 represents "no haunting", 5 "moderate haunting" and 10 "extremely haunted"?
2
9. What issues does the review team need to address with the occupant (homeowner, business owner, resident)? What aspects of the investigation need to be re-addressed, retested, or clarified?
I don't know if an investigation performed on the anniversary of the tragedy would yield more paranormal activity.
10. Is there any other information that you would like to add about this investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Cheryl: While the seems void of emotion, I expected more of a carefree, positive "vacation" feel to the area which did not occur.
Beth:
1. What was your role in this investigation? (Please check one)
Sensitive/Psy
2. What equipment did you use on this investigation?
Digital camera
Electro Magnetic Field Meter (EMF meter)
3. What phenomena did you experience on this investigation? (Please check all that apply)
Sensation of energy
4. In review of the footage, recording, or photographs taken at the location, which of the following did you find? (Please check all that apply)
No unusual occurrences at all
5. What technical observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Beth- There were several spikes on the emf meter (15-100) while Brandy briefed the group at the start of the investigation. The emf also spiked twice (100) while discussing an entity in the guard shack. It was later established that the guard shack entity was a playful joke. But there was a spike at that time.
6. What sensitive observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
I had the feeling of energy at the end of the span where the two lanes would have come together at one time. At this time Les noticed a spike in the emf (2.5 on the 1-3 scale)
7. What researched/historical information did you learn about this location? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
No Response
8. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the haunting of this location? Note on scale: 1 represents "no haunting", 5 "moderate haunting" and 10 "extremely haunted"?
4
9. What issues does the review team need to address with the occupant (homeowner, business owner, resident)? What aspects of the investigation need to be re-addressed, retested, or clarified?
I think that we should investigate the south span of the bridge in the future.
10. Is there any other information that you would like to add about this investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Despite the beautifully clear day and many families at the bridge to fish, the area seemed to be emotionless and flat.
Mary:
1. What was your role in this investigation? (Please check one)
Investigator (general)
2. What equipment did you use on this investigation?
Digital camera
3. What phenomena did you experience on this investigation? (Please check all that apply)
Battery drainage or power outage
Other (please specify below)
Comment: Feeling of despondency upon entering the area.
4. In review of the footage, recording, or photographs taken at the location, which of the following did you find? (Please check all that apply)
No unusual occurrences at all
5. What technical observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Mary: My camera batteries died as soon as I tried to take a picture.
6. What sensitive observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Mary: Entering into the area that is now called the North Pier and which is immediately past the Blackthorn Memorial, I had a feeling of utter despair..there was nothing that seemed positive about this place despite the fact that there were lots of people there fishing and children playing. Having been raised in St Petersburg, I was familiar with the original Skyway as well as the newer span. As a child my father and I had actually fished from this general area. I had no bad memories or feelings when growing up only 10 minutes away. My thoughts continued this time with the bus speeding into oblivion when the Skyway was rammed in May of 1980. That trajedy happened just about 4 months after the sinking of the Blackthorn on which the lives of 23 men were lost. To get to the pier, you must pass the memorial. Together these two events lend an eerie atmosphere to this place. (Having been a military wife and also having had lots of military men and women visit our home over the years, it may be that I am particularly sensitive to those who lost their lives on the Blackthorn.
7. What researched/historical information did you learn about this location? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Mary: The articles printed under the Skyway constitute my historical knowledge. I do remember the original Skyway Bridge and then the second span from traveling over them many times.
8. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the haunting of this location? Note on scale: 1 represents "no haunting", 5 "moderate haunting" and 10 "extremely haunted"?
6
9. What issues does the review team need to address with the occupant (homeowner, business owner, resident)? What aspects of the investigation need to be re-addressed, retested, or clarified?
The review team needs to check the South Pier as well to see if there are any different feelings there. There is no major tragedy that happened on that side that I am aware of and so it would be interesting to see if it is more peaceful. I think some EVP communication may be beneficial at the Blackthorn Memorial as well.
10. Is there any other information that you would like to add about this investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
No Response
Kim:
1. What was your role in this investigation? (Please check one)
Sensitive/Psy
2. What equipment did you use on this investigation?
No Response
3. What phenomena did you experience on this investigation? (Please check all that apply)
Sensation of energy
4. In review of the footage, recording, or photographs taken at the location, which of the following did you find? (Please check all that apply)
No Response
5. What technical observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Kimberly: N/A
6. What sensitive observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Kimberly: One very brief sensation of energy in the pavilion at the end of the pier during the Puck session.
7. What researched/historical information did you learn about this location? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Kimberly: None.
8. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the haunting of this location? Note on scale: 1 represents "no haunting", 5 "moderate haunting" and 10 "extremely haunted"?
1
9. What issues does the review team need to address with the occupant (homeowner, business owner, resident)? What aspects of the investigation need to be re-addressed, retested, or clarified?
N/A
10. Is there any other information that you would like to add about this investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Kimberly: None
Les:
1. What was your role in this investigation? (Please check one)
Investigator (general)
2. What equipment did you use on this investigation?
Digital camera
Electro Magnetic Field Meter (EMF meter)
3. What phenomena did you experience on this investigation? (Please check all that apply)
No Response
4. In review of the footage, recording, or photographs taken at the location, which of the following did you find? (Please check all that apply)
No unusual occurrences at all
5. What technical observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Les The only thing I seen was an occational spike on the EMF meter
6. What sensitive observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Les None
7. What researched/historical information did you learn about this location? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Les Already knew about some of the stories about happenings on the bridge. Also knew the history behind the collapse of the bridge as I was crossing the bridge to Sarasota for work every day. That day it was very foggy so we delayed our usual trip untill the fog lifted and as it turned out it was a good move or we would have been very close to the event!
8. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the haunting of this location? Note on scale: 1 represents "no haunting", 5 "moderate haunting" and 10 "extremely haunted"?
2
9. What issues does the review team need to address with the occupant (homeowner, business owner, resident)? What aspects of the investigation need to be re-addressed, retested, or clarified?
Nothing to review at this point but maybe it was just a slow day.
10. Is there any other information that you would like to add about this investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Les The company that I work for was involved with the construction of the new bridge that replaced the old span. Although we spent many nights on the bridge deck we never seen anything out of the ordinary. However on atleast 3 different occations we experienced problems with the equipment that would cause it to stop running. After working on it for a while we could get it to run again with no apparent reason for the breakdown. Later as we talked about it we realized that these breakdowns happen in generally the same area of the deck on the north end of the Bradenton side of the bridge before the hump. We did not work on the raised section only the level deck on both sides of the hump. I personally don't know if this is related to anything else but makes me wonder.
Brandy:
1. What was your role in this investigation? (Please check one)
Investigator (general)
2. What equipment did you use on this investigation?
Digital camera
Paranormal Puck
3. What phenomena did you experience on this investigation? (Please check all that apply)
Very cold and breezy. Felt dizzy on part of the bridge by the entrance.
4. In review of the footage, recording, or photographs taken at the location, which of the following did you find? (Please check all that apply)
No unusual occurrences
5. What technical observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Brandy: none
6. What sensitive observations did you note during the investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Brandy: None
7. What researched/historical information did you learn about this location? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
Brandy: I talk about the bridge on my ghost tours. These include: (Tampa Bay Triangle): The bridge was said to be built on the remains of a Native American mound and, thus, cursed; (Tampa Bay Triangle) Vanishing hitchhiker: Blonde woman said to hitch hike across the bridge, gets picked up and then disappears from cars. Heard an interview on WUSF years ago from a retiring toll booth worker who had to calm people down because they had encountered her. Flirty Fisher (unknown source): Fisherman flirts with women (may be contamination from Ft. DeSoto); (Tampa Bay Triangle) Vanishing bus (anniversary of disaster the bus drives over the bridge.
8. On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the haunting of this location? Note on scale: 1 represents "no haunting", 5 "moderate haunting" and 10 "extremely haunted"?
2
9. What issues does the review team need to address with the occupant (homeowner, business owner, resident)? What aspects of the investigation need to be re-addressed, retested, or clarified?
Check other span.
10. Is there any other information that you would like to add about this investigation? For purposes of categorizing data, please post your first name, followed by your response.
I think that was it.